← Back to the card
Bout #849🏆 Decision Final· Elections

Nevada Judge Dismisses 2020 'Fake Elector' Case

A Nevada judge dropped the case against six Republicans who submitted a certificate falsely declaring Donald Trump the winner of the state's 2020 presidential election. The defendants argued their actions were 'political theater' to publicize election concerns, not an attempt to deceive. This dismissal is the latest in similar cases across swing states.

Rule of the ring

Two corners. Two cases. Tap each card below to hear their case — open both to unlock your vote and reveal where America stands.

01

Republican Corner · GOP

Political Speech Protected

Judge Confirms Actions Were Political Theater, Not Deception

Republicans maintain that their submission of an alternate electoral certificate was a legitimate act of political protest intended to publicize concerns about the 2020 election. The judge's ruling, citing a lack of deceptive intent and open actions, validates this defense against what they see as politically motivated prosecution.

Tap to hear the Republican Corner's case3 arguments · required to unlock your vote
No Intent to Deceive

The electors openly announced their actions and purpose, rather than attempting to secretly induce governmental reliance. The judge found insufficient evidence of an intent to deceive government officials.

Politically Motivated Prosecution

The Nevada Attorney General's decision to appeal and his earlier move to relocate the case to a Democratic-leaning county suggest political motivations. Defense attorneys label the appeal as hasty and premature, emphasizing political rather than legal merit.

Preserving Legal Rights

Submitting the certificate was a way to preserve their right to challenge the election results in court. This legal strategy allowed them to pursue their concerns within the established constitutional framework.

GOP
02

Democrat Corner · DEM

Protect Election Integrity

Accountability Needed for Undermining Election Results

Democrats argue that attempts to submit false electoral certificates directly undermine the integrity of the democratic process and the will of the voters. Despite the judge's ruling, they believe such actions warrant legal accountability to deter future attempts to overturn legitimate election outcomes and to uphold democratic norms.

Tap to hear the Democrat Corner's case3 arguments · required to unlock your vote
Undermining Democracy

The actions of the 'fake electors' sought to subvert the democratic process and overturn the certified results of a free and fair election. Such attempts erode public trust in electoral outcomes and institutions.

Accountability Essential

Even if intent to deceive was not proven to the judge's satisfaction, the act of submitting false documents should face legal consequences. Holding individuals accountable is crucial for deterring future challenges to legitimate election results.

Uphold Voter Will

Joe Biden won Nevada's 2020 election by a clear margin, and efforts to create alternate slates of electors directly contradict the votes cast by the state's citizens. The Attorney General is correct to appeal and continue seeking justice.

DEM

🏆 Final Decision · Bell has rung

America sided with the Republicans

Republican
53%
592 votes
Democrat
47%

Voting closed. The verdict on Nevada Judge Dismisses 2020 'Fake Elector' Case is in.

🥊 Rematch · Next bout up

Trump Pauses Canada Tariffs Amid Trade Negotiations

Step into the ring →
All Bouts On The Card

Up Next On The Card